Royal Oppression. These Ruling s have not been confirmed as applicable to the TCG. This means you have one opportunity to activate it, the initial chain in direct response to the attack declaration. Unlike the other cards listed above, " Battle Fader " has a Trigger Effect , so you would be unable to activate multiple copies of " Battle Fader " in response to the same attack declaration.
References: [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49]. There are basically 2 ways to Special Summon a monster. The second way is built in to the monster, and Special Summons it without activating an effect, such as " Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning " or " Dark Necrofear ". In the first case, you chain the activation of " Royal Oppression "'s effect to the activation of the Spell, Trap, or Monster Card's effect, and negate the effect.
In the second case, right before the monster is Special Summoned , you can activate the effect of " Royal Oppression " to negate the Special Summon the same procedure that you use for " Horn of Heaven " or " Solemn Judgment ". You can chain to this effect by activating the effect of " Royal Oppression ". The effect of " Marauding Captain " is negated, no monster is Special Summoned , and the " Marauding Captain " is destroyed. The monster your opponent intended to Special Summon with the effect of " Marauding Captain " remains in his hand.
But if Felgrand can literally break logic with his effect and its allowed then so should the beelze loophole, and as for the only official card ruling for either card they are OCG not TCG and almost every broken card is allowed in OCG. Dharc Advanced Member.
Edited by user TZ Reason: Not specified. Somethings are not officially stated because they are part of basic game mechanics. A monster has to be considered face-up on the field before its effect is active. This has always been the case and does not require a official ruling just for beelze.
Solemn Warning negates his summon, hence he's not on the field. There are always ways around cards. Beelze can still be targeted, which means you can kill him with dimensional prison, compulsory, fiendish chain, etc. Felgrand can be easily taken out as well since just because he is unaffected by card effects, doesn't mean he can't be destroyed by battle. In addition, his effects are only once per turn.
You can also chain his effect to breakthrough skill, fiendish chain, etc. Back in the day, people used to solemn judgment Jinzo all the time and there would be the question why does solemn judgment work if Jinzo negates traps. It's the exact same reason, his effect was not active since he was not considered on the field. Also, please understand that we are not insulting your knowledge. We are simply trying to explain the question you have asked. It is not a bug.
You can google it, this question has been asked before on several other forums. That means, it doesn't count itself. There's no broken mechanics. These rules have been around for a long time. People always misunderstand Rai-oh's effect.
It's works just like black horn of heaven. Regardless of what your local tournament judges have done, these are the official rules that almost all national tournaments use.
You can email konami actually and ask simple ruling questions. They will actually reply. Dude, you need to calm down. It's just a game. Shi-En's card states he can negate any trap or magic cards once per turn. It says nothing on his card about not being able to negate counter traps. This is getting tiresome. If the card cannot negate certain cards, it should say so on the card.
Cards do not need to restate basic game mechanics in their text. The rulebook itself states that effects of lower spell speeds cannot be chained to the effects of higher spell speeds. All they need to do is put most in there. Wiki Explore. Structure Deck R Starter Decks.
0コメント