Conflicts occur in the individual when more than one, equally powerful desires or motives present at the same time and pressurize for immediate satisfaction. If any one of the motive is weak, it will be suppressed and the stronger motive gains satisfaction.
Conflicts give rise to a lot of tension in the individual, he becomes completely disturbed. Tension continues until a decision is taken and conflict is resolved. In total conflict may be a friction between two desires, motives, needs or values, finally the stronger one will take upper hand. Sometimes, when he cannot resolve the conflicts, the individual will be put into severe consequences, which he cannot withstand and try to escape from the field itself through unhealthy means. These are the conflicts caused within the individual.
These conflicts arise as a result of two or more motives or goals to be achieved at a time. Hence, these are called goal conflicts. Lewin has described three types of goal conflicts. However, in addition to these there is one more conflict in which the individual faces more than one attracting or repelling forces making the individual to experience more stress.
In this type of conflict individual will have two desires with positive valence which are equally powerful. For example, a person has two attractive job offers and he has to choose any one of them- tension arises. Such conflicts are not so harmful, because after selecting one, the other one automatically subsides or loses its importance to him.
But in some situation choice will be very difficult. For example, a girl has to choose either loving parents or a boy friend for inter-caste marriage. The individual will be psychologically torn and may lose equilibrium. This type of conflict is diagrammatically represented in Figure 4. This conflict involves two goals with negative valence. At times the individual is forced to choose one among two negative goals.
In such conflicts, both are unwanted goals, but he cannot keep quiet without opting also. For example, a woman must work at a job which she dislikes very much or else she has to remain unemployed. Here the individual is caught between two repelling threats, fears or situations.
When she cannot choose either of them she may try to escape from the field itself. But the consequences of the escape may also be harmful. For example, a person who cannot convince the mother or the wife may resort to Alcohol consumption which is otherwise dangerous or some people may even commit suicide.
Such type of conflict is diagrammatically represented in Figure 4. This is also a most complex conflict and very difficult to resolve. Because in this type of conflict a person is both attracted and repelled by the same goal object. Read next. More like this. Remember me. Forgotten your password? Need help? Contact SAGE. With institutional access I can: View or download all content my institution has access to.
To enhance your experience on our site, SAGE stores cookies on your computer. Consumers are either motivated by a positive or a negative reinforcement, which forms the basis for the individuals motivation to act and make consumer decisions. A group of psychologists determined that there are three types of conflict: approach-approach, approach-avoidance, and avoidance-avoidance.
Six situations produce four types of conflict: approach, avoidance, approach-approach, avoidance-avoidance, approach-avoidance and double approach-avoidance. Sometimes the urge to do something worthy or good or pleasurable is opposed by the fact that it involves pain or inconvenience or hard work. Then the organism is in conflict between two opposite motives.
An intellectual conflict is a conflict of thoughts and ideas while an emotional conflict is a conflict of feelings. Many fiction writers are tempted to use intellectual conflicts because we all see such conflicts everywhere, on the morning news and in newspapers, on the government websites and social media. Emotions interfere with our ability to identify and maintain focus on the issue during conflict. The reason we are so eloquent after the conversation is over is because emotions have subsided and rational thought is now in command of our thinking.
Emotions are a powerful force. Examining such expression helps reveal the intentions of the parties and their openness to finding a resolution to the problem. It also explains the reactions of the parties in the conflict, and how the conflict proceeds in a positive or negative direction. Originally Answered: How can a lawyer argue without crying?
By using logic to overrule emotions. Appeal using reason and facts not crying and heartstrings. Or use both or whatever gets the right verdict. No matter that the cause of the fight was, many men will feel guilty about making a woman cry. In these cases, it can have the effect of cooling down heated emotions.
So yes. For the most part a guy will feel bad for making his girlfriend cry.
0コメント